ComplyGuideComplyGuide
HomeSoftwareLearn
Submit a Tool
ComplyGuideComplyGuide

Find and compare the best compliance automation tools. Trusted by thousands of compliance professionals.

Directory

  • All Vendors

Frameworks

  • SOC 2
  • HIPAA
  • GDPR
  • ISO 27001
  • PCI DSS
  • FedRAMP
  • NIST CSF

Resources

  • Learn

For Vendors

  • Submit a Tool
  • Premium Subscription
  • Claim Your Listing

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 ComplyGuide. All rights reserved.

Made for compliance professionals

Get a RecommendationBrowse Tools
Home / Vendors / Archer vs AuditBoard

Archer vs AuditBoard

Choosing between Archer and AuditBoard for compliance automation? Both support SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, while Archer also covers HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, NIST CSF. This comparison breaks down ratings, pricing, framework coverage, and key differences to help you decide.

Reviewed by ComplyGuide Editorial Team·Updated March 2026
Quick Verdict

Frameworks

Archer (7 vs 3)

Starting Price

Tied ($Contact for pricing/mo)

User Rating

AuditBoard (4.5/5)

Archer logo

Archer

4.0/5 (0 reviews)

Founded in 2001, Archer by RSA is an enterprise integrated risk management platform used by large organizations and government agencies to manage risk, compliance, and policy programs. It provides a comprehensive suite for operational risk, third-party governance, audit management, and regulatory compliance. It holds a strong 4.0/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Houston, TX. The company has 501-1000 employees. It supports SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, NIST CSF.

SOC 2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001
PCI DSS
FedRAMP
NIST CSF
AuditBoard logo

AuditBoard

4.5/5 (0 reviews)

Founded in 2014, AuditBoard transforms how audit, risk, ESG, and compliance professionals manage their programs. Enterprise-grade platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and more. It holds a excellent 4.5/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Cerritos, CA. The company has 501-1000 employees. It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.

SOC 2
ISO 27001
PCI DSS

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureArcherAuditBoard
Rating4.0/5 (0 reviews)4.5/5 (0 reviews)
Starting PriceContact for pricingContact for pricing
Founded20012014
Company Size501-1000501-1000
HeadquartersHouston, TXCerritos, CA
Frameworks73
Pricing Plans32

Framework Support

FrameworkArcherAuditBoard
FedRAMP
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO 27001
NIST CSF
PCI DSS
SOC 2

Pricing Comparison

Archer Pricing

  • ProfessionalCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom
  • Enterprise PlusCustom
View full pricing

AuditBoard Pricing

  • ProfessionalCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom
View full pricing

Verdict

In summary: AuditBoard has a notably higher user rating (4.5 vs 4.0). Also, Archer supports additional frameworks (HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, NIST CSF) that AuditBoard does not cover. Also, Archer has been in the market longer (since 2001), while AuditBoard (since 2014) brings a more modern approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your organization's specific compliance requirements, team size, and budget. We recommend requesting demos from both vendors before committing.

View ArcherView AuditBoard

When to Choose Each

Choose Archer if:

  • You need HIPAA or GDPR or FedRAMP or NIST CSF compliance support
  • You need multi-framework compliance across 7 standards
  • You want more pricing flexibility (3 plans to choose from)
  • You prefer an established vendor with a longer track record (since 2001)

Choose AuditBoard if:

  • Peer reviews matter to you (4.5/5 user rating)
  • You want a more modern platform built with newer technology

Ready to decide?

Get pricing information directly from these vendors.

Archer

Get Pricing Info

AuditBoard

Get Pricing Info

More Comparisons

Compare Archer

Sprinto logoArcher vs SprintoWiz logoArcher vs WizDrata logoArcher vs DrataAll Archer alternatives →

Compare AuditBoard

Sprinto logoAuditBoard vs SprintoWiz logoAuditBoard vs WizDrata logoAuditBoard vs DrataAll AuditBoard alternatives →