ComplyGuideComplyGuide
HomeSoftwareLearn
Submit a Tool
ComplyGuideComplyGuide

Find and compare the best compliance automation tools. Trusted by thousands of compliance professionals.

Directory

  • All Vendors

Frameworks

  • SOC 2
  • HIPAA
  • GDPR
  • ISO 27001
  • PCI DSS
  • FedRAMP
  • NIST CSF

Resources

  • Learn

For Vendors

  • Submit a Tool
  • Premium Subscription
  • Claim Your Listing

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 ComplyGuide. All rights reserved.

Made for compliance professionals

Get a RecommendationBrowse Tools
Home / Vendors / Drata vs Prevalent

Drata vs Prevalent

Choosing between Drata and Prevalent for compliance automation? Both support SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, while Drata also covers PCI DSS and Prevalent also covers NIST CSF. This comparison breaks down ratings, pricing, framework coverage, and key differences to help you decide.

Reviewed by ComplyGuide Editorial Team·Updated March 2026
Quick Verdict

Frameworks

Tied

Starting Price

Tied ($Contact for pricing/mo)

User Rating

Drata (4.7/5)

Drata logo

Drata

4.7/5 (0 reviews)

Founded in 2020, Drata is the world's most advanced security and compliance automation platform. It continuously monitors and collects evidence of a company's security controls while streamlining compliance workflows end-to-end. It holds a excellent 4.7/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in San Diego, CA. The company has 501-1000 employees. It supports SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.

SOC 2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001
PCI DSS
Prevalent logo

Prevalent

4.2/5 (0 reviews)

Founded in 2013, Prevalent is a leading third-party risk management platform that helps organizations assess, monitor, and remediate vendor and supplier risks. The platform combines automated assessments, continuous monitoring, and a global vendor intelligence network to manage supply chain risk. It holds a strong 4.2/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Fort Lee, NJ. The company has 201-500 employees. It supports SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, NIST CSF.

SOC 2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001
NIST CSF

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureDrataPrevalent
Rating4.7/5 (0 reviews)4.2/5 (0 reviews)
Starting PriceContact for pricingContact for pricing
Founded20202013
Company Size501-1000201-500
HeadquartersSan Diego, CAFort Lee, NJ
Frameworks55
Pricing Plans33

Framework Support

FrameworkDrataPrevalent
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO 27001
NIST CSF
PCI DSS
SOC 2

Pricing Comparison

Drata Pricing

  • StartupCustom
  • GrowthCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom
View full pricing

Prevalent Pricing

  • StandardCustom
  • ProfessionalCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom
View full pricing

Verdict

In summary: Drata has a notably higher user rating (4.7 vs 4.2). Also, Prevalent has been in the market longer (since 2013), while Drata (since 2020) brings a more modern approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your organization's specific compliance requirements, team size, and budget. We recommend requesting demos from both vendors before committing.

View DrataView Prevalent

When to Choose Each

Choose Drata if:

  • You need PCI DSS compliance support
  • Peer reviews matter to you (4.7/5 user rating)
  • You want a more modern platform built with newer technology

Choose Prevalent if:

  • You need NIST CSF compliance support
  • You prefer an established vendor with a longer track record (since 2013)

Ready to decide?

Get pricing information directly from these vendors.

Drata

Get Pricing Info

Prevalent

Get Pricing Info

More Comparisons

Compare Drata

Sprinto logoDrata vs Sprinto1Password logoDrata vs 1PasswordWiz logoDrata vs WizAll Drata alternatives →

Compare Prevalent

Sprinto logoPrevalent vs SprintoWiz logoPrevalent vs Wiz1Password logoPrevalent vs 1PasswordAll Prevalent alternatives →