Choosing between Lacework and Schellman for compliance automation? Both support SOC 2, PCI DSS, while Lacework also covers HIPAA and Schellman also covers ISO 27001. This comparison breaks down ratings, pricing, framework coverage, and key differences to help you decide.
Frameworks
Tied
Starting Price
Tied ($Contact for pricing/mo)
User Rating
Schellman (4.5/5)
4.3/5 (0 reviews)
Founded in 2015, Lacework provides cloud security and compliance for SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. Automates security across AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes environments. It holds a strong 4.3/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in San Jose, CA. The company has 501-1000 employees. It supports SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS.
4.5/5 (0 reviews)
Founded in 2009, Schellman is a leading global independent security and privacy compliance assessor offering SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST, and FedRAMP assessments. It holds a excellent 4.5/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Tampa, FL. The company has 201-500 employees. It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.
| Feature | Lacework | Schellman |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3/5 (0 reviews) | 4.5/5 (0 reviews) |
| Starting Price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Founded | 2015 | 2009 |
| Company Size | 501-1000 | 201-500 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, CA | Tampa, FL |
| Frameworks | 3 | 3 |
| Pricing Plans | 2 | 2 |
| Framework | Lacework | Schellman |
|---|---|---|
| HIPAA | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| PCI DSS | ||
| SOC 2 |
In summary: Schellman edges out on user rating (4.5 vs 4.3). Also, Schellman has been in the market longer (since 2009), while Lacework (since 2015) brings a more modern approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your organization's specific compliance requirements, team size, and budget. We recommend requesting demos from both vendors before committing.
Get pricing information directly from these vendors.
