Choosing between Opus and Schellman for compliance automation? Both support SOC 2, ISO 27001, while Opus also covers GDPR and Schellman also covers PCI DSS. This comparison breaks down ratings, pricing, framework coverage, and key differences to help you decide.
Frameworks
Tied
Starting Price
Tied ($Contact for pricing/mo)
User Rating
Schellman (4.5/5)
4.2/5 (0 reviews)
Founded in 2020, Opus provides GRC (governance, risk, and compliance) automation for GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other frameworks with focus on third-party risk management. It holds a strong 4.2/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel. The company has 51-200 employees. It supports SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001.
4.5/5 (0 reviews)
Founded in 2009, Schellman is a leading global independent security and privacy compliance assessor offering SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST, and FedRAMP assessments. It holds a excellent 4.5/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Tampa, FL. The company has 201-500 employees. It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.
| Feature | Opus | Schellman |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2/5 (0 reviews) | 4.5/5 (0 reviews) |
| Starting Price | Contact for pricing | Contact for pricing |
| Founded | 2020 | 2009 |
| Company Size | 51-200 | 201-500 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tampa, FL |
| Frameworks | 3 | 3 |
| Pricing Plans | 2 | 2 |
| Framework | Opus | Schellman |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR | ||
| ISO 27001 | ||
| PCI DSS | ||
| SOC 2 |
In summary: Schellman edges out on user rating (4.5 vs 4.2). Also, Schellman has been in the market longer (since 2009), while Opus (since 2020) brings a more modern approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your organization's specific compliance requirements, team size, and budget. We recommend requesting demos from both vendors before committing.
Get pricing information directly from these vendors.
