ComplyGuideComplyGuide
HomeSoftwareLearn
Submit a Tool
ComplyGuideComplyGuide

Find and compare the best compliance automation tools. Trusted by thousands of compliance professionals.

Directory

  • All Vendors

Frameworks

  • SOC 2
  • HIPAA
  • GDPR
  • ISO 27001
  • PCI DSS
  • FedRAMP
  • NIST CSF

Resources

  • Learn

For Vendors

  • Submit a Tool
  • Premium Subscription
  • Claim Your Listing

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 ComplyGuide. All rights reserved.

Made for compliance professionals

Get a RecommendationBrowse Tools
Home / Vendors / Schellman vs ServiceNow GRC

Schellman vs ServiceNow GRC

Choosing between Schellman and ServiceNow GRC for compliance automation? Both support SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, while ServiceNow GRC also covers HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, NIST CSF. This comparison breaks down ratings, pricing, framework coverage, and key differences to help you decide.

Reviewed by ComplyGuide Editorial Team·Updated March 2026
Quick Verdict

Frameworks

ServiceNow GRC (7 vs 3)

Starting Price

Tied ($Contact for pricing/mo)

User Rating

Schellman (4.5/5)

Schellman logo

Schellman

4.5/5 (0 reviews)

Founded in 2009, Schellman is a leading global independent security and privacy compliance assessor offering SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST, and FedRAMP assessments. It holds a excellent 4.5/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Tampa, FL. The company has 201-500 employees. It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.

SOC 2
ISO 27001
PCI DSS
ServiceNow GRC logo

ServiceNow GRC

4.1/5 (0 reviews)

Founded in 2004, ServiceNow GRC provides governance, risk, and compliance management built on the ServiceNow platform. It enables organizations to create a real-time view of compliance and risk across the enterprise by integrating with existing ServiceNow ITSM and ITOM workflows. It holds a strong 4.1/5 rating based on 0 reviews. Headquartered in Santa Clara, CA. The company has 1000+ employees. It supports SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, NIST CSF.

SOC 2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001
PCI DSS
FedRAMP
NIST CSF

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureSchellmanServiceNow GRC
Rating4.5/5 (0 reviews)4.1/5 (0 reviews)
Starting PriceContact for pricingContact for pricing
Founded20092004
Company Size201-5001000+
HeadquartersTampa, FLSanta Clara, CA
Frameworks37
Pricing Plans23

Framework Support

FrameworkSchellmanServiceNow GRC
FedRAMP
GDPR
HIPAA
ISO 27001
NIST CSF
PCI DSS
SOC 2

Pricing Comparison

Schellman Pricing

  • AssessmentCustom
  • ContinuousCustom
View full pricing

ServiceNow GRC Pricing

  • StandardCustom
  • ProfessionalCustom
  • EnterpriseCustom
View full pricing

Verdict

In summary: Schellman edges out on user rating (4.5 vs 4.1). Also, ServiceNow GRC supports additional frameworks (HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP, NIST CSF) that Schellman does not cover. Also, ServiceNow GRC has been in the market longer (since 2004), while Schellman (since 2009) brings a more modern approach. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your organization's specific compliance requirements, team size, and budget. We recommend requesting demos from both vendors before committing.

View SchellmanView ServiceNow GRC

When to Choose Each

Choose Schellman if:

  • Peer reviews matter to you (4.5/5 user rating)
  • You want a more modern platform built with newer technology

Choose ServiceNow GRC if:

  • You need HIPAA or GDPR or FedRAMP or NIST CSF compliance support
  • You need multi-framework compliance across 7 standards
  • You want more pricing flexibility (3 plans to choose from)
  • You prefer an established vendor with a longer track record (since 2004)

Ready to decide?

Get pricing information directly from these vendors.

Schellman

Get Pricing Info

ServiceNow GRC

Get Pricing Info

More Comparisons

Compare Schellman

Sprinto logoSchellman vs SprintoWiz logoSchellman vs WizDrata logoSchellman vs DrataAll Schellman alternatives →

Compare ServiceNow GRC

Sprinto logoServiceNow GRC vs SprintoWiz logoServiceNow GRC vs WizDrata logoServiceNow GRC vs DrataAll ServiceNow GRC alternatives →